Friday, October 22, 2010

Why "teach" Popular Culture?

The question is “Why teach Popular Culture?”

I thought the answer was simple, because it is important to adolescents. Seems simple enough, right? But, as a teacher, I have some across times when someone will make a comment about reading “the classics” or he/she may imply that by not teaching the accepted canon of literature, I, and others, am doing a disservice to the students. Perhaps I am, but as a literature teacher I am constantly looking for novels, stories, movies, etc., that will engage the interests of my students. As much as I love some of the novels from my youth, my passion will only push the students so far; the stories just aren’t as relevant to them.

I can’t think of one of my 8th graders this year that never watches TV or movies, plays video games, listens to music, or reads magazines; they are inundated with various forms of culture. And since all these forms of media surround them, why shouldn’t we use it in the classroom? I mean, does it really matter if a student has read To Kill a Mockingbird if they can receive the same thematic message from a song, a poem, a short story, or a movie? (Side note – I do have my enriched students read this in class…I love the book!)

Morrell makes the case for pop culture in the classroom by providing four main reasons for its use (37). They are:

Popular Culture is…

…relevant to the lives of adolescents. Since many adolescents spend their time immersed in magazines, music, movies and TV, we should use these items to help students to be able to critically analyze the information in them so that they may become more conscious consumers of media. Much production of mainstream media is geared directly toward adolescents and young adults, forcing them to grow aware of the messages and material. There is an argument that pop culture can actually have a negative impact on students, due to it being harmful to their self-esteem, especially in ways in which groups are portrayed (stereotypes). To help combat this, teachers should be help their students to be active learners, learning the ways to critically look at something in order to determine its purpose, or effect it may have on others.  

…is embedded with relevant literacy practices. I mentioned earlier that I sometimes have the feeling that some teachers believe that the “classics,” and only the classics, should be used in a classroom. Morrell mentions that this goes back to a long held belief of the differences between popular culture and “elite” culture. He argues that the literacy practices the students are involved with are actually just as rigorous, if not more so, as the classics used in many secondary classrooms. Many students, when interested in a new movie or band, will read the articles found in Rolling Stone or Spin. These articles are mostly non-fiction, informational expository texts, which more and more surround the students (either in standardized tests or just their everyday reading.) Many times these magazines also include articles that impact the everyday social and cultural aspect of the student’s environment, whether it concerns the current economic status of the country, current political debates, or any other issue of significance. The use of the Internet has also helped the students to become better researchers. Although we still have a problem with possible plagiarism and incorrect information, the Internet does allow us to teach students the strategies needed to critique, analyze, and evaluate information.      

…can help students make connections to academic texts and concepts. Morrell draws upon Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in order to support his belief that the use of pop culture in the classroom will help students to use their strengths and background experiences as starting points that will help them to build upon more skills and concepts. As teachers, we need to take steps to celebrate the diversity of all the students in our classes, by allowing them the opportunity to make sense of the texts that are important to them and that permeate their lives. Then, they will become better equipped to engage with more challenging and complex texts later. SIDENOTE - This reminds me of the movie Dangerous Minds with Michelle Pfeiffer (based on the true story of LouAnne Johnson). Do you remember it? If I remember correctly, she becomes a teacher and the majority of her students just do not want to engage in ANY learning experience. So, in order to help them she brings in the music of Bob Dylan, karate, and the poetry of Dylan Thomas.  I am not sure how many of her students really liked, or had even heard of, Bob Dylan, but in the movie some students did do a turnaround.

…fosters greater motivation among students. Morrell cites two theories of achievement motivation that he uses to help support his opinion of pop culture in the classroom: Expectancy-Value Models of Motivation (EVM) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). Using the EVM theory, Morrell argues that by including elements of pop culture familiar to students, they will have greater expectation to succeed, as well as having a greater incentive to work as well, both components of the theory. The SCT builds upon Bandura’s belief that people will learn skills when they are motivated to do so, and that self-efficacy is a key in achievement. There is also the social aspect of learning that is important, and the idea that students learn better or more through enactive learning (learning reinforced through reward and punishment), learning by doing, and vicarious learning; all a part of the social element Morrell uses throughout his examples in the book.    


I have to say that right now, I am thoroughly enjoying this book. It makes so much sense to me that I am having a hard time imagining someone arguing against these practices in a classroom. Perhaps it is because I am a newer (11 years) teacher, than some of those with whom I work (one of my teammates began teaching the year after I was born), that I can understand the need to pull the students into the learning. And truth be told, I kinda like some of the same things they do!  


What is next? How to include music in the classroom!  


Morrell, E. (2004). Linking Literacy and Popular Culture: Finding Connections for Lifelong Learning. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.

7 comments:

  1. Misty,

    This post has me thinking about the video that we watched in class on Monday (the animated one of Sir Ken Robinson's Changing Paradigms talk) about students being bored with the things that they're supposed to be learning in classes. Material such as the classics may be relevant in theme, as you say, but if it doesn't appear relevant to the students, then it won't be useful in their lives and they won't make appropriate or critical connections--in fact, they'll be "alienated" and "marginalized" by education, rather than drawn into it.

    I also really Morrell's use of the Zone of Proximal Development in this context; I read your other post (on hip hop) first, and while reading it, this term popped into my head, so I was definitely glad to read this post and see it had occurred to Morrell, as well!

    Erin p

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi, It's Noha Ghaly.
    I need to comment here on Morrell’s reasons he gave for including pop culture in classroom, especially the second paragraph:

    When I read here in your review about some teachers insisting on including and relying only on classics, it reminded me of the video we watched together in one of our last sessions on Changing Education paradigm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4U emphasizing the idea that the current education system is designed and conceived for a different age. It was conceived in the intellectual culture of the enlightenment and it was structures in the economic circumstances of the industrial revolution (according to the video). This is all was driven by an economic imperative at the time and how this developed into the “intellectual model of the mind” that viewed intelligence as based on deductive reasoning and knowledge of the classics and this is what we come to think of as academic ability and this is what in the gene pool of public education. Public education view students as academic or non-academic, smart or non smart people and the result of this is that many smart people think they are not because they are being judged against this particular view of the mind mentioned earlier.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Erin, :) I am glad we made the same connection to this great video we watched in class :) it proves how this video really succeeded in capturing our attention and made us think of education system and issues related to it!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Another point I need to comment on here is the third paragraph of Morrell’s justification of using pop culture in classrooms

    Morrell stressed that pop culture would help students connects to academic texts and concept. This reminds me of my book on teaching foreign languages and how the author of my book recommended that teachers, when creating a context for teaching a foreign language, should PERSONALIZE what is going to be taught so that students would relate to the teacher’s talk (in my book, the writer provides several other techniques for creating foreign language teaching context). In other words, teachers should link what they teach to their students’ lives and activities and day-to-day activities. I think this is the common point between our books Misty. Personalizing that my author talked about comes from considering the students’ pop culture that your author here dealt with.
    Noha Ghaly

    ReplyDelete
  5. One last comment here about thus use of pop culture in classroom and how this will motivate students with an emphasis on the expectancy-value model. Actually, I agree 100 % as I myself used the expectancy value model to broaden Gardner’s model (1985) of motivation to better predict and examine the variables of motivation.

    Expectancy-value theories have examined motivation from a cognitive perspective. Such theories perceive motivation and individuals from a different perspective than previous models of motivation in the field of L2 learning. Motivation is recognized as a product of an individual’s thoughts, rather than a function of a certain drive or need (Dörnyei, 1994). The expectancy-value theories identify individuals as being involved in an activity of an instrumental nature to achieve a goal of a certain value (Oxford & Shearin, 1994). Further, the main focus of these theories is the expectation held by an individual that s / he will receive a reward as a result of certain performance (Oxford & Shearin, 1994).

    If anyone is interested in the expectancy model and how it is used or applied in more academic settings, I will be happy to share this information with you!

    Noha Ghaly

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with the arguments to teach pop culture, those given by the author as well as by those who contributed to this strand. I would never change my mind on this if I taught middle school or high school or even at the college level. What I would like to know is how the link between classics and pop culture is made; whether the classics are actually read by students after the link is made; and how the teacher who integrates pop culture into the standard curriculum responds to the political to pressure from political powers that would like teachers to concentrate on skills and content that are more amenable to passing the standardized tests.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The idea of using popular culture in classroom seems to be interesting. I do agree with the author that choosing an appropriate aspect of popular culture could be useful because it is embedded within relevant literacy practices that could motivate students. Reading this reminds me of the situation of ESL/EFL students in Saudi Arabia. More specifically, since soccer is almost the most popular aspect of the youth's culture there, I was thinking of how engaging and motivating would it be if the students read an article that talks about a certain match and if teachers then ask them to write an essay about it.
    At the same time, I do agree with David about his last point regarding the pressure from some kinds of power that want teachers to focus on teaching students only content and skills that can help them to pass the standardized tests …. Abdullah

    ReplyDelete